SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Bates NA, Ford KR, Myer GD, Hewett TE. Clin. Biomech. 2013; 28(4): 459-466.

Affiliation

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Sports Medicine Biodynamics Center and Human Performance Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, United States; University of Cincinnati, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cincinnati, OH, United States.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.02.013

PMID

23562293

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Though the first landing of drop vertical jump task is commonly used to assess biomechanical performance measures that are associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in athletes, the implications of the second landing in this task have largely been ignored. We examined the first and second landings of a drop vertical jump for differences in kinetic and kinematic behaviors at the hip and knee. METHODS: A cohort of 239 adolescent female basketball athletes (age=13.6 (1.6)years) completed drop vertical jump tasks from an initial height of 31cm. A three dimensional motion capture system recorded positional data while dual force platforms recorded ground reaction forces for each trial. FINDINGS: The first landing demonstrated greater hip adduction angle, knee abduction angle, and knee abduction moment than the second landing (P-values<0.028). The second landing demonstrated smaller flexion angles and moments at the hip and knee than the first landing (P-values<0.035). The second landing also demonstrated greater side-to-side asymmetry in hip and knee kinematics and kinetics for both the frontal and sagittal planes (P-values<0.044). INTERPRETATION: The results have important implications for the future use of the drop vertical jump as an assessment tool for anterior cruciate ligament injury risk behaviors in adolescent female athletes. The second landing may be a more rigorous task and provides a superior tool to evaluate sagittal plane risk factors than the first landing, which may be better suited to evaluate frontal plane risk factors.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print