Citation

Schuster C, McCaskey M, Ettlin T. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2013; 11(1): 45.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group - BMC)

DOI

10.1186/1477-7525-11-45

PMID

23497358

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Australian Whiplash Disability Questionnaire (WDQ) was cross-culturally translated, adapted, and tested for validity to be used in German-speaking patients. The self-administered questionnaire evaluates actual pain intensity, problems in personal care, role performance, sleep disturbances, tiredness, social and leisure activities, emotional and concentration impairments with 13 questions rated on an 11-point rating scale from zero to ten. METHODS: In a first part, the Australian-based WDQ was forward and backward translated. In a consensus conference with all translators and health care professionals, who were experts in the treatment of patients with a whiplash associated disorder (WAD), formulations were refined. Original authors were contacted for clarification and approval of the forward-backward translated version. The German version (WDQ-G) was evaluated for comprehensiveness and clarity in a pre-study patient survey by a random sample of German-speaking patients after WAD and four healthy twelve to thirteen year old teenagers. In a second part, the WDQ-G was evaluated in a patient validation study including patients affected by a WAD. Inpatients had to complete the WDQ-G, the North American Spine Society questionnaire (NASS cervical pain), and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at entry in the rehabilitation centre. RESULTS: In the pre-study patient survey (response rate 31%) patients rated clarity for title 9.6 +/- 0.9, instruction 9.3 +/- 1.4 and questions 9.6 +/- 0.7, and comprehensiveness for title 9.6 +/- 0.7, instruction 9.3 +/- 1.4 and questions 9.8 +/- 0.4. Time needed to fill in was 13.7 +/- 9.0 minutes. In total, 70 patients (47 females, age = 43.4 +/- 12.5 years, time since injury: 1.5 +/- 2.6 years) were included in the validation study. WDQ-G total score was 74.0 +/- 21.3 points (range between 15 and 117 points). Time needed to fill in was 6.7 +/- 3.4 minutes with data from 22 patients. Internal consistency was confirmed with Cronbachs's alpha = 0.89. Concurrent validity showed a highly significant correlation with subscale pain and disability (NASS) at r = 0.74 and subscale pain (SF-36) at r = 0.71. CONCLUSIONS: The officially translated and adapted WDQ-G can be used in German-speaking patients affected by a WAD to evaluate patients' impairments in different domains. The WDQ-G is a self-administered outcome measure showing a high internal consistency and good concurrent validity.

Language: en