Citation

Fenerty L, Thibault-Halman G, Bruce BS, Landry J, Young J, Walling S, Clarke DB. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013; 74(3): 895-900.

Affiliation

From the Division of Neurosurgery (L.F., G.T.-H., B.S.B., J.L., S.W., D.B.C.), Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada; and Department of Health and Wellness (J.Y.), Government of Nova Scotia, Canada.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

10.1097/TA.0b013e31827e19ca

PMID

23425754

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Canada, winter sports injuries are responsible for significant health care burden, with estimates of $400 million in direct and indirect annual health care costs. For ski-related injuries, helmets have been shown to provide significant protection. Current common practice in Canada, including the Province of Nova Scotia, is to leave the decision of whether to wear a helmet to the individual. The purposes of this study were to document skiers' and snowboarders' use of helmets and to isolate factors associated with helmet use and nonuse. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was used to collect data during a 2-month period at the province's three ski hills. Naturalistic observations documented helmet use and falls, whereas interviews identified factors influencing helmet use or nonuse. RESULTS: Helmets were used by most skiers (74%) and snowboarders (72%); the use varied significantly between ski hills, ranging from 69% to 79%. Females were more likely to wear helmets compare with males (80% vs. 70%). The highest rates of use were found among 4-year-old to 12-year-old children, with helmet use declining as age increases. Qualitative data revealed that helmet users were most influenced by the protective benefits of helmets (77%), personal choice (46%), family (44%), and rules (44%), while non-helmet users cited personal choice (29%), comfort (26%), rules (14%), and cost (11%) as reasons for nonuse. CONCLUSION: More than 25% of skiers and snowboarders remain at increased risk of a serious brain injury by not wearing a helmet. Changes in regulations may be required to ensure widespread use of helmets on ski hills. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level II.

Language: en