SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Edwards RE, Tolin P, Jonsen GL. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 1982; 26(5): 441-445.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1982, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/154193128202600513

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This report presents data obtained from two line-oriented simulations conducted in the Boeing 757/767 simulators. The purpose of these simulations was to assess the impact of two navigation- and two flight control modes on pilot visual behavior during an entire flight, from takeoff to touchdown. The two navigation modes were the traditional VOR mode, in which a compass rose was presented on the HSI, and the MAP mode, in which a pictorial representation of the airplane's flight path was presented on the HSI. The flight control modes were manual and coupled flight. The results indicated that: (a) the electronic map did not alter the basic "T" scan pattern, (b) the pilots' basic scan pattern did not differ in the two navigation modes when flying manually, (c) pilot scan patterns did vary as a function of flight control condition, with the basic "T" scan pattern accurately characterizing pilot visual behavior in the manual mode but not in the coupled mode, (d) several visual performance measures were sensitive to changes in flight phase, navigation mode, and flight control mode, and (e) no differences in pilot scan patterns were observed between an EICAS- equipped cockpit and a cockpit with conventional engine instruments.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print