SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Turbell T. Proc. IRCOBI 1974; 2: 278-287.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1974, International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Frontal impact simulations with 25 different types of child restraint systems have been made with Alderson 3- and 6-years-old anthropometric dummies. Impact speed has been 50 km/h and deceleration levels 15-20 g. Electrical measurements, according to SAE J 211a, have included dummy head and chest accelerations, sled acceleration and forces acting on the restraint systems. High-speed photography has also been used.

The most significant difference between various types of systems has been that the resultant head acceleration and the hyperflexion of the neck is considerably lower with rearward facing seats com- pared with forward facing seats, cushions, shells and harnesses. It is proposed that, when using the test methods described in this paper, the following main performance criteria shall be met: Maximum resultant head acceleration: 50g; Maximum vertical head acceleration: 20g.

This implies that, among the systems existing today, only rearward facing seats can be approve. Behaviourial studies and experience from the 100,000 rearward facing seats used in Sweden confirm that this is a practical and usable design concept for a child restraint system.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print