Citation

Klaschka U. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2013; 9(3): 358-362.

Affiliation

University of Applied Sciences Ulm, Prittwitzstr. 10, D-89075 Ulm, Germany. Klaschka@hs-ulm.de.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry)

DOI

10.1002/ieam.1397

PMID

23325757

Abstract

Contact allergy is a global health problem that could be alleviated considerably if the general public could reduce contact to sensitizers. Efficient hazard communication would be a valuable instrument to achieve this. What do current regulations concerning fragrance sensitizers in cosmetic products in Europe contribute? There are for example bans and restrictions according to the Cosmetic Regulation, there is the "26 allergens rule" that requires that the names of some allergenic fragrance ingredients are listed on the containers, there is labelling and classification of hazardous products according to Regulation 1272/2008, and there is the regulation concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals. Do these regulations increase consumer protection by suitable hazard communication instruments? Four main problems were identified: (1) According to the "26 allergens rule" consumers carry a very large part of the responsibility for risk reduction management. They need to be capable and motivated to recognize the names of strong allergens listed in the ingredient list and decide for themselves whether they want to run the risk or not, provided that they are aware of their responsibility. (2) Cosmetic products do not need to be classified and labelled like other consumer goods according to EC 1272/2008 if they contain hazardous substances. (3) Some pictograms for hazardous substances as for example the exclamation mark for sensitizers are not well understood by the majority of the general public. (4) Very often, the design of cosmetic containers implies health and well being, even if the respective products contain sensitizers or other hazardous substances. Against this background, the following improvements are proposed: (1) The "26 allergens rule" needs revision. (2) The exception for cosmetic products from labelling and classification should be abolished. (3) A new self-explanatory pictogram for skin sensitizers and skin irritants should become mandatory for consumer products containing allergens. (4) Packaging of products containing hazardous substances should not be allowed to be attractive and evoke feelings that the products were harmless. Labelling of consumer products can be a very efficient tool for risk communication, however the addressees must be sufficiently trained to understand the system and know the consequences of their behavior. Transparent labelling will increase the credibility of manufacturers and can lead to a subsequent improved risk management with a benefit for all stakeholders. Integr Environ Assess Manag © 2013 SETAC.

Language: en