Citation

Fitz-Gibbon K, Stubbs J. Aust. N. Zeal. J. Criminol. 2012; 45(3): 318-336.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2012, Australian and New Zealand Society of Criminology, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0004865812456853

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Over the past three decades, debates about legal reforms to lethal violence have been evident across Australia and in other jurisdictions. While these debates have often arisen from shared concerns, the resulting reforms have taken different approaches to reformulating the defences to murder. This article considers the divergent approaches taken to reform and the process of law reform itself, documenting the significance of localised histories and high profile cases. It also questions whether reforms to the defences to murder have responded adequately to the varying contexts within which men and women kill. The analysis reveals the limitations of law reform inquiries that fail to take a comprehensive approach to considering the operation of the laws in this area. The article calls for ongoing critical analysis of homicide within and beyond the law.

Language: en