Citation

Douglas H. Aust. N. Zeal. J. Criminol. 2012; 45(3): 367-382.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2012, Australian and New Zealand Society of Criminology, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0004865812456851

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In response to calls for reform, some jurisdictions have introduced specialised offences and defences for battered women who kill their abuser. In 2005, Victoria introduced the offence of 'defensive homicide'. More recently, in 2010, Queensland introduced a defence titled 'killing for preservation in an abusive domestic relationship'. If successful these approaches result in a conviction of defensive homicide and manslaughter respectively. While defensive homicide has been explored in a number of cases in Victoria; the Queensland defence has only been considered on a few occasions to date. This article reviews the underlying debates relating to these developments and then examines recent case law to consider the application of these two approaches and their effectiveness in light of what they were designed to achieve. The article concludes that the reforms may have resulted in some unintended consequences.

Language: en