Citation

Scialfa CT, Borkenhagen D, Lyon J, Deschênes M. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2013; 51: 268-273.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada. Electronic address: scialfa@ucalgary.ca.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.006

PMID

23287114

Abstract

Hazard perception is a vital component to safe driving and hazard perception tests (HPTs) are being used with greater frequency for driver training, assessment and licensure. In this study, we compared a dynamic HPT (Scialfa et al., 2011), which presents short video scenes to observers and a static HPT (Scialfa et al., 2012), which uses still images. Both tests require the observer to indicate the presence of a traffic conflict that would lead to a collision between the "camera" vehicle and another road user or fixed object. Young adult drivers (n=56) completed both forms of the HPT, along with a modified version of the Driver Behavior Questionnaire (Reason et al., 1990) and a measure of simple reaction time. Self-reported collision and moving violation data were also collected. As in previous work, both static and dynamic HPTs had good reliability. The correlation between composite static and dynamic scores was approximately .40, but was reduced to approximately .25 when simple reaction time was controlled. Both HPTs predicted lapses and errors on the Driver Behavior Questionnaire, but neither predicted self-reported collisions or moving violations. Discussion focuses on the differences in visual cues available in dynamic and static scenes and how these differences could influence decisions about potential hazards.

Language: en