Citation

Kendall WD, Cheung M. J. Child Sex. Abus. 2004; 13(2): 41-57.

Affiliation

P.O. Box 4161, Beaumont, TX, 77704, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2004, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1300/J070v13n02_03

PMID

15388411

Abstract

This article analyzes the civil commitment models for treating sexually violent predators (SVPs) and analyzes recent civil commitment laws. SVPs are commonly defined as sex offenders who are particularly predatory and repetitive in their sexually violent behavior. Data from policy literature, a survey to all states, and a review of law review Websites identify 16 states that have civil commitment statutes to address the problem and treatment of SVPs, four states that are in the process of passing such laws, six states that failed to enact proposed statutes, six states that lack SVP legislation, and 18 states that do not have relevant data available. The majority of such laws have created a false sense of safety because they address only convicted sex offenders. New approaches to the civil commitment of sexually violent predators have created multifaceted demands, controversy, ethical dilemmas, and learning opportunities. It is advised that research should be focused on the parameters of sexually violent behaviors, program flexibility, and treatment effectiveness.

Language: en