Citation

Carsell KM, Pingel ND, Ford DT. Nat. Hazards Rev. 2004; 5(3): 131-140.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2004, American Society of Civil Engineers)

DOI

10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2004)5:3(131)

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

A flood warning system yields direct and indirect, tangible and intangible benefits. To achieve this, the system includes hardware, software, plans and procedures, and personnel that work in an integrated manner to increase the mitigation time available prior to the onset of flooding. This mitigation time increase is a consequence of a reduction in the time required to collect data, to evaluate and identify the flood threat, to notify emergency personnel and the public, and to make decisions about the appropriate response. The direct tangible benefit--the inundation damage reduction--can be computed with standard expected damage computation procedures, using modified depth-damage functions that include mitigation time as an independent variable and accounting for improvements to the efficiency of response due to the implementation of the flood warning system. This proposed method is applicable for benefit evaluation for any flood warning system; it is illustrated here with an example from the Sacramento River basin of central California.