SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

inivasan R, Lyon C, Persaud BN, Baek J, Gross F, Smith S, Sundstrom C. Transp. Res. Rec. 2012; 2279: 108-117.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2012, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences USA, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.3141/2279-13

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This study estimated crash modification factors (CMFs) from before-after evaluations of two treatments targeted at reducing left-turn crashes at signalized intersections: (a) changes from permissive to protected-permissive phasing and (b) the implementation of a flashing yellow arrow for permissive left turns. Results of the first evaluation--based on 59 intersections in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and 12 in North Carolina--indicated a substantial reduction in left-turn opposing through crashes, especially at intersections at which more than one leg was treated, and a small percentage increase in rear-end crashes. For the second evaluation (the implementation of the flashing yellow arrow)--based on data from 51 signalized intersections in Oregon, Washington State, and North Carolina--the results indicated a safety benefit at locations with some kind of permissive left-turn operation before and a disbenefit at locations that had a protected-only operation before. The study estimated the standard deviation of the distribution of the CMF in addition to the conventionally estimated standard error of the mean CMF value. For several CMFs, the standard deviation of the distribution was larger than the standard error of the mean value of the CMF and indicated a substantial variation in the effect of the treatment across different sites. This finding indicates the need for further research into the development of crash modification functions instead of CMFs and for the use of large treatment databases to undertake a more extensive disaggregate analysis of the safety effects. The finding also emphasizes the importance of providing a more explicit consideration of CMF variability in future editions of the "Highway Safety Manual."

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print