SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Su JZ, Kim AK, Mawhinney JR. J. Fire Prot. Eng. 1996; 8(2): 45-63.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1996, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/104239159600800201

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This paper provides a review of total flooding gaseous agents as Halon 1301 substitutes. Agents are compared, based on published data, in terms of their environmental impact, toxicity, fire suppression performance, and acid gas production from small-to full-scale tests. These data are also collected in tables.
Acceptability of an agent by regulatory authority is mostly determined by agent toxicity. Based on the toxicity criteria set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), five commercial halocarbons (FC-218, FC-3-1-10, HFC-23, HFC-227ea, and HCFC Blend A) and three commer cial inert gases (IG-01, IG-55, and IG-541) are acceptable for total flooding in normally occupied spaces. They are less effective by weight or volume than Halon 1301, with additional limitations and weaknesses.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print