Citation

Daigle MS, Labelle R, Côté G. Int. J. Law Psychiatry 2006; 29(5): 343-354.

Affiliation

University of Quebec at Trois-Rivières, P.O. Box 500, Trois-Rivières, Canada, G9A 5H7.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2006, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.01.004

PMID

16759704

Abstract

The Suicide Risk Assessment Scale (SRAS; nine items) is useful in correctional settings but needed further validation. First, 44 inmates originally screened as suicidal with the SRAS were evaluated by institutional psychologists according to five criteria: suicidal urgency, risk, appropriateness of referral, need for short- or long-term watch. On the whole, the SRAS was judged to be as effective as a more elaborate test. Second, 242 suicidal and non-suicidal inmates were tested with the SRAS. Their results correlated better with suicidal risk (.71) than with urgency (.50). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis even showed that the SRAS performed better than a more elaborate test in predicting risk.

Language: en