Citation

Kennedy CH, Porter Evans J, Chee S, Moore JL, Barth JT, Stuessi KA. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 2012; 27(8): 817-827.

Affiliation

Department of Behavioral Sciences, Marine Corps Embassy Security Group, Quantico, VA, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1093/arclin/acs092

PMID

23059351

Abstract

Little data exist regarding the acute assessment of blast concussion and the course of recovery in the combat zone, as most research has examined service members long after they have returned home. This manuscript examined a case series of 377 service members seen for acute concussion evaluation following medical evacuation from the battlefield in Helmand Province, Afghanistan. Of these, 111 were assessed for concussion prior to their return to the continental USA for other severe physical injuries. Of the remainder, and when comparing those who returned to duty (RTD)/recovered from concussion in the combat zone and those who did not, data indicate that those who did not RTD were older and were more likely to endorse symptoms of combat stress. Quicker recovery times were associated with less severe headaches and fewer acute symptoms at the time of injury as well as the absence of combat stress reaction. Variables that were not associated with RTD and/or recovery were Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE) cognitive scores and whether or not individuals suffered loss of consciousness. While MACE scores were not associated with recovery, they were deemed clinically useful as a part of a serial concussion evaluation if the initial MACE was given within 6 h of the blast. Implications for battlefield concussion assessment and management as well as future research directions are discussed.

Language: en