Citation

Andrews DM, Fiedler KM, Weir PL, Callaghan JP. Ergonomics 2012; 55(12): 1548-1558.

Affiliation

a Department of Kinesiology , University of Windsor , 401 Sunset Avenue , Windsor , ON N9B 3P4 , Canada.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2012, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/00140139.2012.726656

PMID

23039371

Abstract

Observation-based posture assessment methods (e.g. RULA, 3DMatch) require classification of body postures into categories. This study investigated the effect of improving posture category salience (adding borders, shading and colour to the posture categories) on posture selection error rates and decision times of novice analysts. Ninety university students with normal or corrected normal visual acuity and who were not colourblind, were instructed to select posture categories as quickly and accurately as possible, in five salience conditions (Plain (no border, no shading, no colour); Grey Border; Red Border; Grey Shading (GS) and Red Shading (RS)) for images presented in randomised blocks (240 classifications made by each participant) on a computer interface. Participants responded quickest in the Border conditions, classifying postures about 5% faster than in the Plain condition. Coloured diagrams significantly reduced posture classification errors by approximately 1.5%. Overall, the best performance, based on both error rate and decision time combined, resulted from incorporating a Grey Border to the posture category diagrams; a simple enhancement that could be made to most current observation-based posture assessment tools. Practitioner Summary: The salience of posture diagrams used in observation-based posture assessment tools was evaluated with respect to analyst error rates and decision times. The best performance resulted from incorporating a grey border to the posture diagrams; a simple enhancement that can be made to most current observation-based posture assessment tools.

Language: en