SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Fujino Y, Takahashi N, Yokogawa T, Kayashima K, Tateishi S, Abe H, Okubo Y, Mori K. Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi 2012; 54(6): 267-275.

Affiliation

Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2012, Nihon Sangyo Eisei Gakkai)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

23001211

Abstract

Objectives: No consistent procedure has been established for advice given by occupational physicians concerning scope of disease, criteria of diagnosis and laboratory data, and basis of judgment. The aim of this study was to identify practice-based contexts of occupational physician's advice. Methods: We interviewed 6 occupational physicians, and held focus group discussions (FGD) involving 19 occupational physicians, academic researchers, and clinical doctors. Scripts of the interview and FGD were coded to identify the contexts of occupational physician's advice. Additionally, to assure the generalizability of the proposed contexts of occupational physician's advice, we also conducted a survey to collect cases of advice, for which the fitness of the proposed contexts was confirmed. Results: Four contexts of occupational physician's advice were identified from interviews and FGD, and an additional context was detected through the occupational physician's survey, namely Type 1, work potentially affects a worker's health; Type 2, risk management and prevention of accidents relating to disease; Type 3, recommendation to visit a doctor (referral); Type 4, communication to the head of the department/supervisor; and Type 5, fit for work with appropriate adjustment of work environment and/or conditions. All 48 cases collected could be classified into one or more of these five contexts. Discussion: This study clarified that several contexts exist for occupational physician's advice in practice. The five proposed contexts reveal different responsibilities and judgments between occupational physician, worker, and employer. Understanding the contexts of occupational physician's advice is important for enhancing consensus-building between stakeholders.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print