Citation

Gottschall JS, Kram R. J. Exp. Biol. 2006; 209(Pt 24): 4895-4900.

Affiliation

Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA. jgottsc@emory.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2006, Company of Biologists Limited)

DOI

10.1242/jeb.02584

PMID

17142678

Abstract

Humans and other animals exchange gravitational potential energy (GPE) and kinetic energy (KE) of the center of mass during level walking. How effective is this energy exchange during downhill and uphill walking? Based on previous reports and our own reasoning, we expected that during downhill walking, the possibility for mechanical energy exchange would be enhanced and during uphill walking, the possibility for exchange would be reduced. We measured the fluctuations of the mechanical energies for five men and five women walking at 1.25 m s(-1). Subjects walked on the level, downhill, and uphill on a force measuring treadmill mounted at 3 degrees, 6 degrees and 9 degrees. We evaluated energy exchange during the single support period based on the GPE and KE fluctuation factors of phase relationship, relative magnitude and extent of symmetry. As expected, during level walking, the GPE and KE curves were out of phase, of similar magnitude, and nearly mirror images so that the fluctuations in combined (GPE+KE) energy were attenuated. During downhill walking, the fluctuations in the combined energy of the center of mass were smaller than those on the level, i.e. mechanical energy exchange was more effective. During uphill walking, the fluctuations in the combined energy of the center of mass were larger than those on the level, i.e. mechanical energy exchange was less effective. Mechanical energy exchange occurred during downhill, level and uphill walking, but it was most effective during downhill walking.

Language: en