Citation

Bachhiesl SM. Arch. Kriminol. 2012; 229(5-6): 198-206.

Vernacular Title

Krimineller Aberglaube um 1900 am Beispiel schwangerer Frauen und kleiner Kinder.

Affiliation

Hans-Gross-Kriminalmuseum der Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2012, Verlag Schmidt-Romhild)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

22834363

Abstract

Around 1900, various crimes were still caused by criminal superstition. Criminologists like Hans Gross, Albert Hellwig and August Löwenstimm were engaged in the exploration of this topic aiming at the complete explanation of criminal behaviour linked to superstition. Crimes against pregnant women and infants are particularly good examples to illustrate the problems arising from crimes motivated by superstition. When assessing superstition under scientific and legal aspects, the criminologists applied different approaches, although positivistic rationalization was the most common tendency. In the forensic and legal evaluation of crimes related to superstition the problematical questions were whether the perpetrator was criminally responsible and how the offence was to be legally qualified. In many cases, criminals motivated by superstition were treated with more lenience.

Language: de