Citation

Benton TR, Ross DF, Bradshaw E, Thomas WN, Bradshaw GS. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 2006; 20(1): 115-129.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2006, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/acp.1171

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Knowledge of factors affecting eyewitness accuracy was examined in a sample of jurors, judges and law enforcement professionals. Participants completed a survey in which they were asked to agree or disagree with 30 statements about eyewitness issues, and their responses were compared to a sample of eyewitness experts who completed the same survey. Participant responses differed significantly from responses of eyewitness experts. Jurors disagreed with the experts on 87% of the issues, while judges and law enforcement disagreed with the experts on 60% of the issues. The findings show a large deficiency in knowledge of eyewitness memory amongst jurors, judges and law enforcement personnel, indicating that the legal system may benefit from expert assistance in the evaluation of eyewitness evidence. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Language: en