Citation

Granhag PA, Strömwall LA, Allwood CM. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 2000; 14(5): 397-420.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2000, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/1099-0720(200009)14:5<397::AID-ACP658>3.0.CO;2-M

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of repetition, memory, feedback, and hindsight bias on the realism in confidence in answers to questions on a filmed kidnapping. In Experiment 1 the participants showed overconfidence in all conditions. In the Repeat condition ('how confident are you now that your previous answers are correct') overconfidence was reduced as a consequence of the decrease in confidence in both correct and incorrect answers compared with the Repeat condition when the participants received feedback on their answers and were asked to remember their initial confidence, the confidence level was higher for correct and lower for incorrect answers. In Experiment 2, recalled confidence (the Memory condition) increased compared with the original confidence both for correct and incorrect answers; the effect of this was increased overconfidence. The Hindsight condition showed a decrease in confidence in incorrect answers. The results suggest that a unique hindsight effect may be more clearly present for incorrect than for correct answers. Our study gives further evidence for the malleability of the realism in eyewitness confidence and we discuss both the theoretical and forensic implications of our findings. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Language: en