SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Milne R, Bull R. Leg. Crim. Psychol. 2003; 8(1): 21-38.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2003, British Psychological Society, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1348/135532503762871219

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Purpose. The first set of aims of the present study concerned event recall and examined; (1) whether the cognitive interview (CI) would enhance event recall when used with children, (2) which category(ies) of event recall might be affected, and (3) where in the interview any CI effect emanates from. The second set of aims concerned suggestibility issues and set out to determine whether (1) the CI increased the resistance of children to suggestive questions, and (2) whether scripts had a role in susceptibility to suggestion.Methods. Eighty-four 8-10-year-old children were shown a video recording of a magic show. A day later they were interviewed individually using either the CI or a structured interview. A pre-set list of suggestive questions was also given to the children either before or after being interviewed.Results. Those children interviewed using the CI recalled significantly more correct details pertaining to persons and actions, with no increase in the reporting of erroneous information. These effects were found to emanate from the questioning phase of the CI. In addition, those children interviewed with the CI were more resistant to subsequently asked suggestive questions, especially misleading script-consistent questions.Conclusions. The CI has been found to be a reliable interviewing technique which not only enhances recall but helps to inoculate children against the effects of misleading questions.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print