Citation

Gough K, Magness L, Winstanley J. Med. Sci. Law 2012; 52(3): 169-173.

Affiliation

Consultant Forensic Clinical Psychologist, Forensic Liaison Team.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2012, British Academy of Forensic Sciences, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1258/msl.2011.011069

PMID

22833486

Abstract

This study is an audit of the Somerset Court Advice and Assessment Service (CAAS) throughout its first year of implementation. It reports that the service successfully met the six desired objectives as set out in its Service Level Agreement. Further to this, it reports that the use of National Health Service electronic patient records within a court setting facilitated the provision of apposite and timely information to the court. Specific findings were that deliberate self-harm/suicidal ideation and mood disorders were the primary reasons for a person requiring CAAS involvement. Violence against the person, breach of orders and theft were the most prevalent categories of offending within this referred group. The prevalence of previous psychiatric history was significantly higher than found in comparable audits. It is likely that this is due to the efficacy of proactive and in vivo utilization of electronic patient records. Conclusions include the need to work in partnership with drug and alcohol agencies and the importance of recognizing that these services have significant clinical benefits for defendants with mental health problems, and the court system in terms of financial savings. We suggest ongoing audit is necessary to guide the development of other schemes in this pioneering service area.

Language: en