Citation

Tresilian JR. Perception 1997; 26(2): 229-36; discussion 237-41.

Affiliation

MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge, UK.

Comment On:

Perception 1993;22(10):1227-44.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1997, SAGE Publications)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

9274756

Abstract

Stewart et al (1993, Perception 22 1227-1224) attempted to demonstrate that the ratio of angular speed to angular acceleration, [symbol see text]/[symbol see text], of the approaching object is preferred as the source of time-to-collision information to the ratio of visual angle to angular speed, [symbol see text]/[symbol see text]. It is demonstrated that this is not justified.

Language: en