Citation

Luo M, He Y, Beck V. Fire Safety J. 1997; 29(1): 1-25.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1997, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison of the results from a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model and a two-zone model against a comprehensive set of data obtained from one flashover fire experiment. The experimental results were obtained from a full-scale prototype apartment building under flashover conditions. Three polyurethane mattresses were used as fuel. The CFAST two-zone model (version 2.0) was also used to predict results for this flashover fire test. The mass release rate, gas temperature, radiation heat flux and gas compositions (O2, CO2 and CO) were measured. A CFD program, CESARE-CFD Fire Model, has been developed and was used also to predict results for polyurethane-slab fire. A simple flame spread model was incorporated into the CFD program to predict the mass release rate and heat release rate during the fire instead of providing it as an input as is required for most zone and CFD models. It was found that the CFD model provided reasonable predictions of the magnitude and the trends for the temperatures in the burn room and the species concentrations, but over-predicted the temperatures in the adjacent enclosures. From a life safety perspective, the CFD model conservatively predicted the concentrations of CO and CO2. The predicted temperatures from the CFAST fire model agreed well with the experimental results in most areas. However, the CFAST model under predicted the temperature in the lower layer of the room of fire origin and the concentration of CO in most areas.