Citation

Mooney J. Crit. Criminol. 2007; 15(2): 159-170.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2007, American Society of Criminology, Publisher Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s10612-007-9023-7

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

How can violence be both a public anathema and a private common place? In order to explore this question, data from the North London Domestic Violence Survey are revisited and the reasons why men justify violence against women investigated. This is related to Sykes and Matza's dual notions of the techniques of neutralization and subterranean values indicating the potential of this work in understanding domestic violence. Further, this paper confronts recent arguments that estimates relating to the extent and distribution of domestic violence are either too unreliable due to problems of response and differences in defining 'violence' or that those figures produced by feminist research arise from a massaging of the data and, as such, exaggerate the risk.