Citation

Mohamad M. Int. J. Law Policy Family 2011; 25(1): 46-70.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2011, The author(s), Publisher Oxford University Press)

DOI

10.1093/lawfam/ebq016

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This article historicises the various phases of Sharia reform in Malaysia, the purpose of which is to show that laws codified for Muslims had undergone considerable flux even over a brief period. In 50 years, the feature of Islamic marriage law reform in Malaysia had shifted from supporting the norms of female progressivism to enhancing privileges for men. This is reflected in the amendments and adjustments made upon the passage of each successive family law statutes, which I label as encapsulating the Plural, Transitional, and New Family Sharia in their respective periods. Cases of Sharia court litigation are also analysed to illustrate how Islamic family laws and their interpretations can be used to exaggerate the discourse of 'god-given' male entitlement as the unequal but desirable complement of good female behaviour. In trying to reconcile this inequality, the Sharia exposes gender dissonances and disjunctures in contemporary Muslim society. Hyped male entitlement and endemic male negligence are revealed as the bitter end of the marriage bargain for women. But as the asymmetrical binary continues to be reinforced by court judgments, the contradictions between ideology and reality are also exposed as a flaw of the Islamic marital contract; the national character of Islamic marriage being mutable in form and essence.

Language: en