Citation

Girdler NM, Fairbrother KJ, Lyne JP, Neave N, Scholey AB, Hargaden N, Wesnes KA, Engler J, Rotherham NA. Br. Dent. J. 2002; 192(6): 335-9; discussion 331.

Affiliation

University of Newcastle Dental School and Hospital, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne. n.m.girdler@ncl.ac.uk

Copyright

(Copyright © 2002, British Dental Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

15552071

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the post-operative cognitive and psychomotor recovery from midazolam conscious sedation, after reversal with the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil over a prolonged recovery period. DESIGN: A prospective, double-blind, randomised, crossover trial. SETTING: Out-patient Sedation Department, Newcastle Dental Hospital and School METHOD: Eighteen patients, ASA I or II, received midazolam on two separate occasions to undergo equivalent dental treatment. Following treatment patients were reversed with intravenous flumazenil or saline (placebo) at alternate appointments. Assessment of mood and cognitive function was undertaken using a highly sensitive and specific computerised battery of cognitive tests administered by telephone. Cognitive and psychomotor tests were administered prior to sedation and every hour for 6 hours post reversal. RESULTS: Results indicated no significant effect of flumazenil on simple reaction time and choice reaction time but did show a trend of reversing the effects of midazolam on numeric working memory and word recognition. CONCLUSION: The cognitive and psychomotor effects of the sedation were not fully reversed by flumazenil. Cognitive impairments were still present up to 6 hours post-reversal, despite patients appearing clinically more alert. This has important implications for treatment protocols and discharge instructions.

Language: en