Citation

Hooper SL. Curr. Biol. 2012; 22(9): R318-22.

Affiliation

Neurobiology Program, Department of Biological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.048

PMID

22575473

Abstract

Nervous systems, muscles, and motor organs (biomechanics) generate movement cooperatively and should therefore change coordinately as body size changes. Proving this hypothesis requires a description of the nervous system, muscle, and biomechanics of individual species and comparison of these properties across a collection of species spanning a large size range. Obtaining these data in even one species is daunting, and we are far from reaching a general theory of how nervous system, muscle, and biomechanics depend on body size. Sufficient cross-species data nonetheless exist to identify some consequences of body size on the neural control of movement, which form the focus of this Primer: for example, locomotor cycle period depends on leg length; large animals should devote more neural resources to hazard avoidance and stride correction; the importance of gravity and momentum increases, and of passive muscle properties decreases, with limb size; and the medium in which movements occur affects these size dependencies. These considerations suggest that, in applying biological data to robotic design, proper 'size' should be maintained across all levels (i.e., if small-animal neural mechanisms are used, so should small-animal muscle and biomechanical properties).

Language: en