Citation

Basso T, Klaksvik J, Syversen U, Foss OA. Injury 2012; 43(10): 1633-1639.

Affiliation

Norwegian Orthopaedic Implant Research Unit (NKSOI) Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.injury.2012.03.032

PMID

22542046

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Orthopaedic implants can be introduced in clinical practice if equivalency to an already approved implant can be demonstrated. A preclinical laboratory test can in theory provide the required evidence. Due to the lack of consensus on the optimum design of biomechanical experiments, setups vary considerably. This review aims to make femoral neck fracture models more accessible for evaluation to orthopaedic surgeons without any particular background in biomechanics. Additionally, the clinical relevance of the different setups is discussed. METHODS: This is a narrative review based on a non-systematic search in PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane. SUMMARY: Biomechanical femoral neck fracture experiments should aim at optimizing the recreation of the in vivo situation. The bone quality of the experimental femurs should resemble the hip fracture population, hence cadaveric bones should be preferred to the available synthetic replica. The fracture geometry must be carefully selected to avoid bias. The load applied to the specimen should result in forces within the range of in vivo measured values and the magnitude should be related to the actual weight of the donor. A well designed biomechanical experiment can prevent harmful devices from being introduced in clinical practice, however, positive results can never exclude the necessity of subsequent clinical studies.

Language: en