SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Lawrence RE, Rasinski KA, Yoon JD, Curlin FA. Contraception 2010; 82(4): 324-330.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.contraception.2010.04.151

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Background
Although emergency contraception (EC) is available without a prescription, women still rely on doctors' advice about its safety and effectiveness. Yet little is known about doctors' beliefs and practices in this area.
Study Design
We surveyed 1800 US obstetrician-gynecologists. Criterion variables were doctors' beliefs about EC's effects on pregnancy rates, and patients' sexual practices. We also asked which women are offered EC. Predictors were demographic, clinical and religious characteristics.
Results
Response rate was 66% (1154/1760). Most (89%) believe EC access lowers unintended pregnancy rates. Some believe women use other contraceptives less (27%), initiate sex at younger ages (12%) and have more sexual partners (15%). Half of physicians offer EC to all women (51%), while others offer it never (6%) or only after sexual assault (6%). Physicians critical of EC, males and religious physicians were more likely to offer it never or only after sexual assault (odds ratios 2.1-12).
Conclusion
Gender, religion and divergent beliefs about EC's effects shape physicians' beliefs and practices.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print