SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Hille R. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2002; 80(6): 298-304.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2002, Institution of Chemical Engineers and European Federation of Chemical Engineering, Publisher Hemisphere Publishing)

DOI

10.1205/095758202321154925

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In a research centre like Jülich where nuclear, chemical, biotechnological and other experimental facilities are in operation the differences in accident analysis and risk assessment in the nuclear and the so-called conventional field are always obvious. The two approaches are practised in parallel and remain almost unaffected by each other although the goal should be the same: to avoid high and unnecessary risks to the employees and the population. This situation is very unsatisfactory for everyone who has safety responsibility for the centre as a whole. An attempt is made in this paper to come to a common risk evaluation for such facilities and to apply two different existing approaches for risk evaluation to three of our installations. The conditions for and the results of these procedures are discussed.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print