Citation

Strauss E, Hultsch DF, Hunter M, Slick DJ, Patry B, Levy-Bencheton J. Clin. Neuropsychol. 1999; 13(4): 420-432.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada. estrauss@uvic.ca

Copyright

(Copyright © 1999, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT420

PMID

10806454

Abstract

The utility of measures for detecting malingering was evaluated using a simulation design in which half the participants were encouraged to do their best and half were asked to feign head injury. Particular attention was focused on the utility of repeated assessment (intraindividual variability) in discriminating the groups. Participants were tested on three occasions on measures commonly used to detect malingering including a specific symptom validity test (SVT). The results indicated that multiple measures of malingering obtained in single assessment (occasion one) discriminated the groups effectively. In addition, however, intraindividual variability in performance, particularly of indicators from the SVT, provided unique information beyond level of performance. The results suggest that response inconsistency across testing sessions may be a clinically useful measure for the detection of malingering.

Language: en