SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Kraus RR, Bergstein JM, DeBord JR. Am. J. Surg. 1999; 178(3): 190-193.

Affiliation

Department of Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1999, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

10527436

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Blunt carotid injuries are rare, and present late with devastating strokes. A sizeable single-institution descriptive report could help characterize the injury and its diagnosis and treatment. METHOD: We performed a retrospective review of blunt carotid artery injuries from May 1988 to December 1997 at a level I trauma center. Chart review consisted of demographics, mechanism of injury, associated injuries, diagnostic modalities, initial neurologic status, treatment, and outcome. Discharge outcome was classified as "good" (normal-mild deficit), "fair" (needing daily assistance), "poor" (institutionalized), or "dead." RESULTS: During the study period 16 patients sustained a carotid artery injury. Mean age was 35 years and 63% were female. Vehicular trauma was the most common mechanism of injury (81%), followed by assaults (13%). Dissection was the most common injury (75%), with one quarter having an associated pseudoaneurysm. Initial neurologic presentation was normal in 31% and Glasgow Coma Score was < 13 in 31% (including 13% in coma). Eventual hemispheric symptoms developed in 81%. Associated injuries were present in 94%, commonly head (44%) and chest (50%). Duplex ultrasound accurately identified the injury in all patients (5 of 5) when used. Anticoagulation (88%) had no complications. Observation and therapeutic embolization each resulted in 1 fatal stroke. A third patient, with worsening deficits on heparin, died after carotid ligation, for an overall mortality of 19%. There were no deaths in the 13 patients treated by anticoagulation alone. Six patients (38%) had a "good" neurologic outcome, five (31%) "fair," and two (13%) "poor." Initial neurologic presentation, associated injuries, and mechanism of injury did not appear to correlate with these outcome categories. CONCLUSIONS: These uncommon injuries should be suspected in the presence of head and/or chest injuries, basilar skull fracture, or coma (particularly if the computed tomography scan is unremarkable). Presentation may be varied, but most patients eventually develop hemispheric symptoms. Duplex ultrasound detects many of these injuries, but this does not demonstrate its utility as a screening tool. Anticoagulant therapy appears to be associated with a better outcome than expectant or occlusive therapy.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print