Citation

Imberton G. Cult. Med. Psychiatry 2012; 36(2): 245-263.

Affiliation

Instituto de Estudios Indígenas, Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas, Centro Universitario Campus III, Boulevard López Moreno s/n., Fátima, CP 29264, San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico, gimberton@gmail.com.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2012, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s11013-012-9252-4

PMID

22382678

Abstract

According to ethnographic material collected since 2003, the Chol Mayan indigenous people in southern Mexico have different causal explanations for suicide. It can be attributed to witchcraft that forces victims to take their lives against their own will, to excessive drinking, or to fate determined by God. However, it can also be conceived of as a conscious decision made by a person overwhelmed by daily problems. Drawing from the theoretical framework developed by Laura M. Ahearn, inspired by practice theory, the paper contends that these different explanations operate within two different logics or understandings of human agency. The first logic attributes responsibility to supernatural causes such as witchcraft or divine destiny, and reflects Chol notions of personhood. The second logic accepts personal responsibility for suicide, and is related to processes of social change such as the introduction of wage labor, education and a market economy. The contemporary Chol resort to both logics to make sense of the human drama of suicide.

Language: en