Citation

Escobedo LG, Chorba TL, Remington PL, Anda RF, Sanderson L, Zaidi AA. Accid. Anal. Prev. 1992; 24(6): 643-653.

Affiliation

Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1992, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

1388582

Abstract

We assessed rates and trends in safety belt use by presence and type of safety belt law using data from states participating in the 1984-1989 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. State(s) with a safety belt law allowing law enforcement officers to stop vehicles for occupants' failure to use safety belts (primary enforcement law) had greater and more rapid increases in safety belt use rates than did states with laws requiring that vehicles must first be stopped for some other violation before a citation or fine for occupants' failure to use safety belts could be imposed (secondary enforcement law). Larger and sustained increases in safety belt use occurred when safety belt laws became effective or when fines were imposed for violations than when laws were first enacted. These data suggest that primary enforcement laws result in greater and more rapid increases in safety belt use than do secondary enforcement laws, and that initial increases in safety belt use following implementation of laws are sustained.