Citation

Bischoping K, Fingerhut N. Can. Rev. Sociol. Anthropol. 1996; 33(4): 481-506.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1996, University of Toronto Press)

DOI

10.1111/j.1755-618X.1996.tb00958.x

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The experiences of indigenous peoples have been left outside the framework of comparative genocide research. We first discuss conceptual reasons for this omission, focussing on the role of genocide definitions, ideological vs. developmental distinctions in genocide typologies, and the emphasis in genocide typologies on the motivations of perpetrators. We then illustrate the relation between indigenous genocides and other genocides by examining three important foci of genocide studies: responses, healing and justice. From these comparisons and contrasts, we conclude that a broader comparative approach that acknowledges the importance of indigenous genocides would contribute significantly to genocide studies. Finally, we note that adherence to European world views in genocide studies limits the potential for constructive analysis.