Citation

Koch I. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2005; 12(1): 107-112.

Affiliation

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Munich, Germany. iring.koch@cbs.mpg.de

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, Psychonomic Society Publications)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

15945203

Abstract

Many studies of task switching have found that a prolonged preparation time reduces switch costs. An alternative manipulation of task preparation is based on sequential task predictability, rather than preparation time. In Experiments 1 and 2 of the present study, participants performed explicitly instructed task sequences (i.e., AABB) and were then transferred to a random sequence. The observed benefit of predictability-based task preparation was not switch specific. In Experiment 3, the participants changed from random to predictable tasks. The observed predictability benefit again was not switch specific. The data thus suggest that task switching does not necessarily require a switch-specific reconfiguration process. Rather, task-specific control processes may be needed in both task switches and repetitions.

Language: en