Citation

Weerdesteyn V, Nienhuis B, Mulder T, Duysens J. Exp. Brain Res. 2005; 161(1): 39-46.

Affiliation

Sint-Maartenskliniek Research B.V., P.O. Box 9011, 6500 Nijmegen, The Netherlands. v.weerdesteyn@smk-research.nl

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s00221-004-2043-6

PMID

15688175

Abstract

In the present study the obstacle avoidance strategy during treadmill walking was investigated in ten young (aged 19-32) and ten older females (aged 65-78). Minimisation of displacement of the foot from its original landing position has been proposed to be the main criterion for the selection of alternate foot placement. Each participant performed 60 obstacle avoidance trials. Foot-obstacle configurations were varied in order to obtain both lengthening and shortening avoidance reactions. For each trial it was calculated how much lengthening and how much shortening of the stride was required minimally for successful avoidance. The difference between required lengthening and required shortening was expressed as a percentage of the control stride length and was used as a measure of minimal displacement. The behavior of young females was in agreement with the minimal displacement criterion. The older females, however, exhibited a strong preference for stride lengthening, even in situations in which stride shortening would be highly favorable. The explanation for the long step strategy preference of the older females is discussed in terms of age-related changes in decision-making, differences between young and older persons in the unobstructed gait pattern, and safety considerations.

Language: en