Citation

Neikrug AB, Ancoli-Israel S. Sleep Med. Rev. 2012; 16(5): 415-429.

Affiliation

SDSU/UCSD Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, United States.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2012, Saunders, Publisher Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.smrv.2011.08.004

PMID

22169258

PMCID

PMC3327886

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is a parasomnia characterized by loss of muscle atonia during REM sleep that results in motor behaviors. Diagnosis of RBD involves a clinical interview in which history of dream enactment behaviors is elicited and a subsequent overnight polysomnography (PSG) evaluation to assess for REM sleep without atonia (RWA) and/or observe motor behaviors during REM sleep. Therefore, the nature of RBD diagnosis involves both subjective and objective measurements that attempt to qualify and quantify the different diagnostic sub-criteria. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of the current study was to identify and summarize the available clinical measurements that have been used for RBD assessment. METHODS: Two major online databases (MEDLINE and PsycInfo) were searched for articles developing, validating, or evaluating psychometric properties of the RBD diagnostic criteria or methods used for diagnosis. Studies of adult subjects (18 years or more) that included sufficient psychometric data for validation were included. RESULTS: Fifty-eight studies were found to meet review criteria. The objective measurements for assessment of RBD reviewed included visual electromyographic (EMG) scoring methods, computerized EMG scoring methods, cardiac (123)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine ((123)I-MIBG) scintigraphy, actigraphy, behavioral classification and video analysis. Subjective measurements of RBD included interviews and questionnaires. CONCLUSION: Sleep history may be sufficient for diagnosis of RBD in some populations. However, PSG is necessary for a definitive diagnosis. EMG scoring methods vary in definition used and there is no single accepted approach to scoring muscle activity. Additional validation studies are required for establishing cutoff scores for the different methods. Questionnaires were shown to be appropriate screening tools, yet further validation in different populations is necessary.

Language: en