Citation

Bust PD, Gibb AGF, Haslam RA. Appl. Ergon. 2005; 36(4): 417-425.

Affiliation

Department of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK. p.d.bust@lboro.ac.uk

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.apergo.2004.05.005

PMID

15892936

Abstract

The manual handling of concrete highway kerbs remains commonplace in the construction industry despite obvious risks to operatives. This study was undertaken to find out why kerb installation still includes manual handling, to identify the alternatives that exist and to consider how the organisation of the work affects exposure to risk. Focus groups were held with industry professionals to discuss kerb design, installation and the training of operatives, with site visits and interviews undertaken to place the focus group findings in context. The focus group discussions highlighted manufacturer's "myopia", a lack of installation knowledge of designers and shortfalls in training for installation work. It was concluded that risks to the health of construction workers remain as they are not considered in the design of the product, design of the work or ameliorated by adequate risk assessment. Recommendations from the research are that a pro-active approach to health needs to be adopted by the manufacturers of heavy construction products. Designers of work requiring the use of heavy products need to have more experience of site operations, and education and training in manual handling is desirable at all levels in construction organisations.

Language: en