SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Cheung M, McNeil Boutte-Queen N. Child Abuse Negl. 2000; 24(12): 1613-1621.

Affiliation

Families Concentration, University of Houston Graduate School of Social Work, TX, USA. mcheung@uh.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2000, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

11197039

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Research on specific emotional responses of professionals to child sexual abuse (CSA), other than the overwhelming feeling, is currently lacking in the child welfare literature. This study examines the initial responses to CSA of police and social workers in Hong Kong. METHOD: Based on their recall of the first child sexual abuse incident, 28 police officers and 86 social workers from 10 training sessions on child sexual abuse in Hong Kong indicated how strong they felt about their emotions in 10 categories of 37 responses. RESULTS: Among the 37 emotional responses, police and social workers showed significant differences in only seven responses: (1) embarrassment with the perpetrator; (2) ambivalence about rescuing the child or preserving the family; (3) fear of being inadequate in handling the situation; (4) titillation in response to our involuntary physiological responses to words and descriptions of sex acts; (5) feelings of revenge because the behavior was bad or immoral; (6) empathy with the child's condition; and (7) ambivalence about helping or punishing the perpetrator. In both groups, "anger at the perpetrator" and "empathy with the child's condition" were the most strongly felt emotions. CONCLUSIONS: Although these two professional groups were not significantly different in most of the emotional responses to their first child sexual abuse incidents, police were more likely to have ambivalent and revenge feelings, while social workers were more likely to have discomfort feelings. Limitations of this research project include sampling procedure, self-report biases, and effect of training.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print