Citation

Widła T, Leśniak M. Arch. Med. Sadowej Kryminol. 2011; 61(1): 70-74.

Vernacular Title

Raport komisji powypadkowej jako dowod w postepowaniu.

Affiliation

Z Katedry Kryminalistyki Uniwersytetu Slaskiego w Katowicach Katowice.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2011, Polish Forensic Medicine Society)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

22117493

Abstract

In practice it happens that both a report of an accident investigation commission and court expert's opinions are under consideration during a civil or criminal case. The authors present three groups of problems that are associated with such situations, attempting to provide answers to the problems. The above-mentioned problems may be presented in the following way: may the body of evidence (inside the range of a court case) incorporate expert opinions, which were prepared for an accident investigation commission (if so--may such opinions replace evidence derived from a court expert's opinion); is it legally admissible to use findings of an accident investigation commission as evidential purpose in crime proceedings (if so--what kind of evidence should such findings represent); how should lawyers decide in case of a contradiction between an expert opinion of an accident investigation commission and a court expert's opinion.

Language: pl