Citation

Arias EH, Asai Y, Chen JC, Cheng HK, Ishii N, Kinugasa T, Ko PC, Koido Y, Murayama Y, Kwong PW, Ukai T. Prehosp. Disaster Med. 2001; 16(1): 29-32.

Affiliation

Geological Survey of Canada, Pacific Division, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2001, Cambridge University Press)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

11367935

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The discussions in this theme provided an opportunity to address the unique hazards facing the Pacific Rim. METHODS: Details of the methods used are provided in the preceding paper. The chairs moderated all presentations and produced a summary that was presented to an assembly of all of the delegates. Since the findings from the Theme 3 and Theme 7 groups were similar, the chairs of both groups presided over one workshop that resulted in the generation of a set of action plans that then were reported to the collective group of all delegates. RESULTS: The main points developed during the presentations and discussion included: (1) communication, (2) coordination, (3) advance planning and risk assessment, and (4) resources and knowledge. DISCUSSION: Action plans were summarized in the following ideas: (1) plan disaster responses including the different types, identification of hazards, focusing training based on experiences, and provision of public education; (2) improve coordination and control; (3) maintain communications, assuming infrastructure breakdown; (4) maximize mitigation through standardized evaluations, the creation of a legal framework, and recognition of advocacy and public participation; and (5) provide resources and knowledge through access to existing therapies, the media, and increasing and decentralizing hospital inventories. CONCLUSIONS: The problems in the Asia-Pacific rim are little different from those encountered elsewhere in the world. They should be addressed in common with the rest of the world.

Language: en