Citation

Royzman E, Kurzban R. Emot. Rev. 2011; 3(3): 274-275.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2011, International Society for Research on Emotion, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/1754073911402402

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Aside from adducing little data that bear on our original concerns (pervasive "audience effects" in the encoding of identifiable "disgust expressions"/lack of morally induced disgust versus moral disgust differentiation), Chapman and Anderson (2011) fail to muster a convincing body of evidence for the founding premise of their empirical endeavor--disgust is a bona fide "basic emotion" whose theoretically predicted FM pattern is a goosebump-like, metaphor-resistant readout capable of being effectively analyzed within the "expression programs" canon, leading us to reaffirm that our favored alternative, the "moral disgust as a metaphor" interpretation, is as consistent with all the pertinent data (including theirs), if not more so.