Citation

Lundrigan S, Canter D. Behav. Sci. Law 2001; 19(4): 595-610.

Affiliation

The Institute of Criminology, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. Samantha.lundrigan@vuw.ac.nz

Copyright

(Copyright © 2001, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

11568963

Abstract

Although the murders committed by serial killers may not be considered rational, there is growing evidence that the locations in which they commit their crimes may be guided by an implicit, if limited rationality. The hypothesized logic of disposal site choice of serial killers led to predictions that (a) their criminal domains would be around their home base and relate to familiar travel distances, (b) they would have a size that was characteristic of each offender, (c) the distribution would be biased towards other non-criminal activities, and (d) the size of the domains would increase over time. Examination of the geographical distribution of the sites at which 126 US and 29 UK serial killers disposed of their victims' bodies supported all four hypotheses. It was found that rational choice and routine activity models of criminal behavior could explain the spatial choices of serial murderers. It was concluded that the locations at which serial killers dispose of their victims' bodies reflect the inherent logic of the choices that underlie their predatory activities.

Language: en