Citation

Varraine E, Bonnard M, Pailhous J. Exp. Brain Res. 2000; 130(2): 248-257.

Affiliation

UMR 6559 Mouvement et Perception, Université de la Méditerranée, CNRS, Faculté des Sciences du Sport, Marseille, France. varraine@laps.univ-mrs.fr

Copyright

(Copyright © 2000, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

10672479

Abstract

The intentional control of stride length is a fundamental basis for the adaptation of the stride to environmental constraints (obstacle avoidance, for example). Controlling the propulsive forces during the stance and/or controlling the pendular movement of the oscillating leg constitute the two potential and non-exclusive mechanisms underlying intentional stride length modulation. The present experiment was conducted in order to determine if these two mechanisms contribute to voluntary length modulation and, if so, how they cooperate according to whether the subject has to lengthen or shorten a stride and how these mechanisms are implemented at the neuromuscular level. Subjects had to produce a temporarily modulated stride of the same length, but originating from two different initial steady-states: one from shorter stride length and one from longer stride length. We found that the shortening was essentially realized by a swing-duration decrease (an increased activity in the hip extensor--biceps femoris--during the swing of the ipsilaterally shortened stride stopped the pendular leg movement earlier). The lengthening was realized by two mechanisms: (1) an increase in the propulsive forces (via an increased activity of the ankle extensor muscles--soleus--and the hip extensors--biceps femoris--from the stance of the ipsilaterally modulated stride, which was prolonged during the following stance of the contralateral leg), and (2) an increase in swing duration on the ipsilateral leg (an increased activity in hip and ankle flexors--rectus femoris and tibialis anterior--maintained the ipsilateral leg in flexion during the lengthened swing so that the foot landed later). In this experiment, the subjects were faced with a spatial constraint of the same magnitude in the direction of stride lengthening and stride shortening. However, under these conditions, subjects used a different balance between swing control (that directly modifies the foot trajectory without affecting the trajectory of the head-arm-trunk system) and/or the control of propulsive forces (that indirectly influences foot trajectory by modifying the trajectory of the head-arm-trunk system). In the first case, this concerns a voluntary control of gesture produced by the legs and usually implicated in the locomotor pointing; in the second case, this concerns a voluntary control of propulsive forces.

Language: en