Citation

Lecky F, Woodford M, Yates DW. Lancet 2000; 355(9217): 1771-1775.

Affiliation

UK Trauma Audit and Research Network, University of Manchester, Hope Hospital, Salford, UK. flecky@fs1.ho.man.ac.uk

Copyright

(Copyright © 2000, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

10832827

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 1988, the Royal College of Surgeons reported major deficiencies in trauma care in UK hospitals. We investigated whether and how that care has changed in the last decade by use of data collected by the UK Trauma Audit and Research Network. METHODS: We analysed injury-severity, process, and outcome variables from 91602 patients' records on the database at the end of 1997, collected from 97 (49% of trauma-receiving) hospitals in England, Wales, and two in Ireland. We did longitudinal analyses of odds of death, process variables, and individual hospitals' performance. We took account of potential selection bias from missing data and recruitment of new hospitals. FINDINGS: The severity-adjusted odds of death after trauma declined gradually from 1989 (odds ratio 1997/1989 0.63 [95% CI [0.49-0.82]). In 1997, the reduction in odds of death was significant even after adjustment for missing data (ratio 1997/1989 0.72 [0.55-0.92]) and recruitment of new hospitals (0.64 [0.44-0.93]). There was significant variability in the proportion of survivors (adjusted for severity of injury and age) between the highest and lowest 10% of UK hospitals. The time between the call to the emergency services and arrival at hospital increased from 32 min in 1989 to 45 min in 1997, irrespective of injury severity. The proportion of severely injured patients seen first by senior doctors increased from 32% to 60%. INTERPRETATION: Hospital care has made a valuable but variable contribution to reductions in case fatality after injury in the UK in the past 10 years, though further improvement is possible.

Language: en