Citation

Eddy DR, Schiflett SG, Schlegel RE, Shehab RL. Acta Astronaut. 1998; 43(3-6): 193-210.

Affiliation

Armstrong Lab, Brooks AFB, TX

Copyright

(Copyright © 1998, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

11541924

Abstract

The impact of microgravity and other stressors on cognitive performance need to be quantified before long duration space flights are planned or attempted since countermeasures may be required. Four astronauts completed 38 sessions of a 20-minute battery of six cognitive performance tests on a laptop computer. Twenty-four sessions were preflight, 9 sessions were in-orbit, and 5 sessions were postflight. Mathematical models of learning were fit to each subject's preflight data for each of 14 dependent variables. Assuming continued improvement, expected values were generated from the models for in-orbit comparison. Using single subject designs, two subjects showed statistically significant in-orbit effects. One subject was degraded in two tests, the other was degraded in one test and exceeded performance expectations in another. Other subjects showed no statistically significant effects on the tests. The factors causing the deterioration in the two subjects can not be determined without appropriate ground-based control groups.

Language: en