CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Hoffman ML. Dev. Psychol. 1975; 11(2): 228-239. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 1975, American Psychological Association) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
unavailable |
|
Abstract |
The following arguments are offered for the view that the frequent correlation between discipline and internalization reflects parental influence: (a) Since parental discipline exerts more constraint on the child than the child exerts on the parent, child attributes like internalization that probably derived from behaviors and inner states associated with compliance are more apt to be consequents than antecedents of discipline. (b) Congenital and other factors that may affect discipline do not negate its effects on internalization. It is also hypothesized that discipline is important because it gives children the experience, necessary for internalization, of achieving balance between expressing and controlling desires. The parent-child relation is conceptualized so as to fit the facts of both everyday interaction and long-term effects, especially on the child. (42 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved) |